• Home
  • Articles
    • Features
      • Boat
      • Fishing
      • Lifestyle
      • Miscellaneous
      • Port of Call
    • Spotlights
      • Miscellaneous
      • Yacht Club Profiles
      • Marina Profiles
    • Departments
      • Boatcare
      • Boatkeeper
      • New Boats
      • New Products
      • Portside Reading
    • Commentary
      • Editorials
      • Letters
  • Classifieds
    • Add Classified
  • Advertising
  • Contact Us
  • News
    • Fishing
    • Lake Erie
    • Lake Huron
    • Lake Michigan
    • Lake Ontario
    • Lake Superior
  • Events
  • GLB Fed
    • Home
    • Membership
    • Current Topics
    • About Fed
  • Virtual Mags
    • Mar-Apr 10
    • Jan-Feb 10
    • Nov-Dec 09
    • Sept-Oct 09
    • July-Aug 09
    • May-June 09
    • Volvo Penta IPS
  • Login
  • Register

Follow the Science on Mid-Level Ethanol Blends

Article posted on December 29, 2009 - 14:41
Change Font Size
+–=
By: 
Thomas J. Dammrich; President; National Marine Manufacturers Association

What do the National Marine Manufacturers Association (NMMA), the American Meat Institute, the Grocery Manufacturers Association, the Natural Resources Defense Council and the National Petrochemical Refiners Association all have in common? All agree that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) should not approve corn ethanol blends in gasoline that are higher than the currently allowable E10 unless and until independent, rigorous and verifiable scientific testing has been completed. What’s more, testing must conclude that mid-level ethanol blends will not pose a risk to all gasoline-powered engines, public health, the environment and  consumers. In fact, a diverse collection of more than 50 environmental groups, conservation organizations, business associations and public interest organizations have banded together to urge the EPA to deny a petition request by the ethanol industry that would allow “mid-level ethanol blends” to be introduced into commerce for general sale.

Boaters in most states have experienced firsthand the problems created by the introduction of gasoline with 10 percent ethanol, or E10. The impacts on engines, fuel lines, gas tanks and other parts of a boats’ fuel systems are well documented and have forced boaters to make major repairs after being caught unaware of the change and potential problems. But, for the most part, the industry has addressed this as marine manufacturers have adjusted certain processes and manufacturing techniques over time.

Now, the ethanol industry is asking the EPA to approve blends higher than E10, including mid-level blends of E12, E15 or E20. There are 13 million registered boats in this country with engines that are not designed, calibrated, certified or warranted to operate with ethanol blends above E10. And, that is just the beginning. If you have other gasoline-powered off-road vehicles, gasoline-powered tools or other gasoline-powered small engines, neither are they! In fact, there are more than 400 million gasoline-powered products today that were never made to run on mid-level ethanol blends.

Now, don’t get me wrong. We are not opposed to ethanol. And, like our allies from a diverse coalition of interests, we want clean air and water, and a cleaner environment. But it is far from clear that mid-level ethanol blends will give us any of those things. Early testing has shown it will give boaters more headaches and potentially destroy marine engines already in use. So, all we ask is that the EPA do the testing, as required by federal law, and follow the science before rushing to a judgment.

In early December, in an announcement that it was delaying a decision on the ethanol industry’s petition to approve E15, the EPA functionally acknowledged widespread concerns about E15 on the environment, engines and consumers by indicating they needed more test data than is currently available. The EPA has not conducted any studies on marine engines or on a wide variety of other non-road engines, although our industry clearly welcomes such testing and hopes it will soon be underway.

The NMMA’s view, as the boat and engine manufacturers’ trade association, is that no decision should be made on E15 until all independent scientific studies confirm that it is compatible with both on-road and non-road vehicles. Even the U.S. Coast Guard has opposed the waiver request expressing “concerns related to a possible reduction in the level of safety for recreational boaters should the waiver be granted.”
The NMMA also believes that any attempts to bifurcate the fuel supply by allowing E15 for only certain vehicles would lead to a myriad of misfueling, liability and consumer safety issues, and likely cause the price of fuel for boaters to increase while the availability of compatible blends decreases. Further, it is not clear that the system of distribution for gasoline is ready for higher blends of ethanol either. In short, there is much more work to do before a decision can be made, and the EPA has the time and resources to make the right decision.

To learn more about why more ethanol in your gasoline is bad for the environment, engines and consumers, visit www.followthescience.org or www.nmma.org/government.

Share/Save
Find Similar Articles:
  • Editorial
  • Engine
  • Fuel
  • Industry
  • Policy
  • Jan Feb 2010
  • Thomas J. Dammrich; President; National Marine Manufacturers Association
»
  • Login or register to post comments

Advertisement

Great Lakes News

  • Today
  • Top
  • The Curtiss MF Flying Boat Is The First Vintage Plane To Be Auctioned In Manhattan
    Bonhams announces the sale of a 1917 Curtiss MF Seagull Flying Boat,...
  • Diamond parcel cleanup is official
    It's official. The city's largest polluted waterfront...
  • Port Huron obeys rules at high cost
    If you're looking for a case study that might explain why so many...
  • Seaway chief: opening date up to us
    The St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corp. likely won't involve...
  • Ancient Sturgeon fish species endangered, but coming back in Great Lakes region
    A leading international conservation group says sturgeon species such...
>> more news
  • Cox: U.S. Supreme Court will reconsider temporary closure of Chicago locks to prevent spread of Asian carp into Great Lakes
    The U.S. Supreme Court will reconsider closing the Chicago canal...
  • Lake Erie water quality worsening
    Lake Erie was shrouded in fog Friday, but its future waters might be...
  • Asian carp search turns up nothing
    Fishery crews have spent the past month chasing Asian carp with nets...
  • Community leaders show interest in expanded wind farm proposal
    Community leaders in the Muskegon area, including some from northern...
  • Lake Ontario fishery "complicated" but thriving
    So, what's up with the Lake Ontario fishery? As the name of a...

Follow Us

See our Twitter Profile
Join us on Facebook

Advertisement

Most Popular Articles

  • All-time
  • Today
  • Doral
  • Muskegon County - a Lake Michigan must
  • Factors Affecting Lake Levels - Role of St. Clair Dredging Still Unknown
  • Climate Change
  • Dredging Shallow Harbors - Great Lakes Boating Federation Draws Attention to Recreational Harbors
  • Traverse City Mayor Reassures Boaters
  • Make Mistakes at the Launch Less Likely with a Safety Checklist
  • Doral
  • Muskegon County - a Lake Michigan must
  • Factors Affecting Lake Levels - Role of St. Clair Dredging Still Unknown
  • Break the Ice
  • Traverse City Mayor Reassures Boaters
  • Climate Change
  • Improve Fuel Efficiency
©2006-2010 Great Lakes Boating

Magazine

  • Home
  • Features
  • Spotlights
  • Departments
  • Commentary

Going On

  • News
  • Events

Extras

  • Virtual Mags
  • Classifieds
  • Advertising
  • Contact

Federation

  • GLB Fed Home
  • About
  • Current Topics
  • Membership
  • America's Boat Show